Facility Owners
You already paid to build your chiller's history. Chiller Trend makes it usable.
Every inspection, PM, repair, recommendation, and operating decision adds to the equipment story. Chiller Trend helps your service team show what changed, why it matters, and what should happen next.
One history. Built visit by visit.
When history is hard to use, owners lose visibility.
The information already exists. The problem is that it gets scattered across logs, reports, emails, BAS screens, and people's memory.
You already paid for the information.
Your service team collects readings, completes inspections, documents repairs, and makes recommendations every year.
But isolated records do not automatically become usable operating history.
- Performance changes can stay hidden between visits.
- Energy waste can continue without creating an alarm.
- Different mechanics may repeat the same troubleshooting.
- Repair recommendations can be harder to verify.
- Knowledge can disappear into PDFs, inboxes, and memory.
The questions your chiller report should answer.
What changed?
- What moved since the last inspection?
- Is the change persistent or did it appear once?
- Is energy use moving in the wrong direction?
Where should we act?
- Which chiller needs attention first?
- Is the issue mechanical, operational, flow-related, or measurement-related?
- What evidence supports the recommendation?
More than a chiller log.
Chiller Trend is a mechanic-integrated diagnostic findings system. It turns routine field readings into usable history, clearer comparisons, evidence-backed findings, and recommended actions.
Usable equipment history
Keep service visits connected so the next inspection does not start from zero.
Prior-visit and peer comparison
Compare each chiller with its own history and similar equipment under comparable conditions.
Findings and recommended actions
See what deserves attention, what should be verified, and what should happen next.
Which chiller, plant, or site is the outlier?
Chiller Trend builds the operating history needed to compare one chiller, a plant, or an entire fleet.
Prior-visit comparison
Compare the chiller with its own operating history to see what changed over time.
Peer comparison
Compare similar chillers at the same site to identify which machine is behaving differently.
Fleet comparison
Compare chillers, plants, or sites across a portfolio to help prioritize maintenance, investigation, and capital attention.
Peer and fleet comparisons should only be used where equipment, operating conditions, and data quality support a fair comparison.
How Chiller Trend works.
Chiller Trend helps the service team you already trust deliver more consistent reporting, faster comparison between visits, and evidence-backed recommendations.
Your mechanic logs the chiller
The normal inspection creates the field data.
Chiller Trend checks and compares
Calculations, history, peer context, and data confidence are applied.
You receive a clearer answer
Your service provider can explain what changed, what it means, and what comes next.
Not another dashboard.
Traditional logs capture snapshots. Remote monitoring provides continuous data. Chiller Trend helps your service team turn field-verified visits into usable history, comparisons, Diagnostic Findings, and Recommended Actions.
What this looks like in the field.
These examples show the type of condition that structured logging, comparison, and field verification can make easier to see.
BAS sensor mismatch
Field measurements showed an environmental input reading high while still appearing believable in the BAS.
Evaporator flow below design
Repeatable comparison showed lower flow aligning with higher chiller power under comparable conditions.
Operating optimization
Review identified chilled-water setpoint and flow operating beyond what the actual load required.
Ask a better question after the next inspection.
Ask your service provider to show what changed, which unit is the outlier, what evidence supports the finding, and what should happen next.